A bad investment?

Texas FooballThe power of football in Texas can be daunting. Just consider the recent remarks made by the chairman of the University of Houston’s board of regents, Tilman Fertitta.

Fertitta is upset that the Big 12 conference does not want to add UH into its fold and told the Houston Chronicle’s editorial board that the Texas legislature should “Put pressure on the presidents; say, ‘If you don’t do this, we’re not going to fund you for this.’ It’s just the way it is. That’s the way to do it.”

Now keep in mind, this is the same person who wasn’t troubled by the fact that Aramark had more information than its potential competitors in bidding for a contract at the universities new stadium saying that’s just the nature of doing business. “I outsmart people all the time,” Fertitta said.

Hey, if you’re not cheating, you’re not trying, right?

But getting back to the playing field. It is ironic that the highest paid state of Texas employee never sees the field, but rather acts as a “special assistant” at the University of Texas. Mack Brown, the former UT head coach is earning a cool $3,824,856 per year. In case you’re curious, the second highest paid employee is current UT head coach Charley Strong, pulling in a measly $3,025,375 per year.

The Horns finished with 6-7 record (5-4 in the Big 12) in 2014 and were rewarded with a trip to the prestigious AdvoCare Texas Bowl where they were trounced 31 – 7 by Arkansas asking the question if they are getting a healthy return on investment, or if they look more like a Vontage IPO.

A Tale of Two Leagues

NFL LogoThe NFL has been busy these past few weeks dodging and weaving like Walter Payton, trying to avoid the big hit. By now, everyone has seen and heard about Baltimore Ravens running back, Ray Rice cold-cocking his then girlfriend in an Atlantic City hotel elevator.

We have since learned that Minnesota Viking running back, Adrian Peterson disciplined his son by giving him a “whooping” causing injuries severe enough to lead a doctor to alert authorities.

We could continue this rap sheet with other names such as Hardy, McDonald and let’s not even get into whether the Redskins is an offense name, or a badge of honor. Let’s face it, the NFL is having a rough time, but much of it seems self-inflicted.

It was not that long ago when former NBA owner Donald Sterling was recorded making racist remarks to his female friend. What happened? The NBA immediately suspended him and forced him to sell his team. Granted, he made a boat-load of money, but the NBA demonstrated a zero tolerance towards anything which could tarnish the league.

Since then, the Atlanta Hawks have also been severely punished for “insensitive” comments, which interestingly enough, are not illegal, yet caused great embarrassment to the NBA.

No one can argue the NFL is the most popular sport in the land. TV ratings seem to be broken every season and fans sell out stadiums every Sunday (and Monday, Thursday and the occasional Saturday games). So it is puzzling why the NFL does not institute a zero tolerance policy. Do they think not having a Ray Rice or Adrian Peterson on the field will diminish fan interest, or God forbid, cause the owners to loose revenue? Former players talk about protecting the shield (the NFL logo), but there seems to be an underlying avoidance of standing up for what’s right in the league office.

Now I do believe in due-process (although that didn’t seem to be a problem when it came to Donald Sterling and the NBA), but many, including sponsors like Anheuser Busch are beginning to ask what the NFL stands for and don’t think that hasn’t gotten the owners attention.

Roger Goodall is taking the heat, but it needs to be noted that he works for 32 owners who are ultimately responsible for what takes place when it comes to league operations. Up to this point, owners are supporting Goodall, but could easily throw him to the wolves, or worse, the court of public opinion, which will make everyone feel better, but solve nothing.

Saving College Football From Itself

downloadThere has been a lot of discussion lately about college athletics, specifically college football. It is obvious that there is a major disparity between the haves and the have not’s. Realistically, 90 percent of schools have no shot at winning a national championship, or even being invited to a major bowl game.

There has also been greater focus put on whether or not football athletes are being used unfairly to generate money for their respective universities.  One school, Northwestern, has voted to unionize while athlete directors seem to talk more these days about expanding the brand and generating revenue than helping student athletes succeed.

So where do we go from here? Perhaps the solution can be found across the pond by taking a page from the Barclay’s Premiere League. The league, for those uninformed sports fans, features England’s best soccer clubs. The clubs play matches outside the league, but winning the Barclay’s is equivalent to winning a Super Bowl or being named National Champions.

Now before you say “I hate soccer, it’s boring”; what makes the Barclay’s Premiere Leagues so unique is that they “relegate” teams every year. That means the bottom three clubs are kicked out and new ones added. (I’m sure the Texans and the Astros are glad the NFL and MLB don’t follow this policy).

The beauty of this set-up is that it creates drama at the top and bottom of the standings. First you would need to set up a “Super Football Conference”. I know there will be lots of disagreement about the criteria, but for the sake of argument, let’s pick last year’s BCS Top 25 schools.  Those not making the cut would remain in their respective conferences.

The top four teams in the BCS standings at the end of the year were Florida, Auburn, Florida State and Michigan State. These schools could have competed in a play-off system to determine the national championship. USC, Duke and Northern Illinois finished at the bottom of the list and would be relegated out of this super conference and returned to their respective conferences.

The incentive is that opens the door to three other schools to join this super conference. Again, the exact criteria would need to be worked out as to how to select those schools. It could be best record, followed by most points scored in a season, but you get the idea and it would give a lot of schools the opportunity to play with the big boys that they might not have gotten in the past.

Perhaps a super conference could also address some of the disparity in college football by allowing them to have different rules including paying athletes and other issues facing big time college football. Yes, this means schools could lose some of their traditional rivalries, but in a world where Texas no longer plays Texas A&M and bowl games seem to extend into February, it might just take a radical move to save college football from itself.

Let the debate begin.

5 Reasons why Barclay’s Premier Soccer is worth watching

barclays premier league_0#5:  Introduction of the teams.

There’s no pyrotechnics or loud obnoxious music to get fans pumped up. Both teams enter the pitch side by side at the same time, often holding the hands of young soccer fan. The home team then walks calmly down the line and shakes the visiting team’s hands and officials.

#4:  The fans

Soccer fans are notorious for being fanatical about their teams and with good reason; some of these teams have been playing over 150 years. It’s not unusual to see fans singing the team fight song throughout the entire game while cheering, moaning and flashing their team’s colors.

#3:  There are no TV timeouts.

While there are plenty of times play is halted, you won’t be inundated with commercial after commercial. You will see little pop-up ads while play is taking place, but it never interferes with the pace or flow the match. Just make sure you visit the Loo prior to the opening whistle.

#2:   Close enough is fine

It is interesting how, in the world of the NFL where every inch of yardage is scrutinized and debated, soccer players simply pick up a ball that went out of bounds and then take a few steps either way to throw the ball back in. The same thing occurs when a ref calls a foul. The ball is simply placed in the “area” where the foul occurred and play is continued. There is no replay to determine the exact spot of where the ball should be placed which adds to more delays and hence more advertisements to sit through.

#1:  Relegation

As the season draws towards the end, all eyes are on the top and bottom of the standings. Not because the bottom three teams will be in a position to draft a good player, but because they will be kicked out of the league. Seeing as how the Houston Texans and Astros finished dead last last year, you have to believe they’re glad they don’t play in the Barclay’s Premier League.

Watch Where You Step!

BV RodeoCheryl and I participated in the Houston Rodeo 5k fun run over the weekend. Felt pretty good about my time and had fun. Great event and crazy fun to run down the parade route with all those people watching.
BVR Rodeo Run

 

Flake-Gate

olympic_rings_fail_getty_1392068024894_2487809_ver1_0_320_240The 2014 Winter Olympics are in full swing and already we’ve seen fantastic finishes, thrilling upsets and stories of perseverance and determination. Unfortunately, most of the social media world’s attention was focused on “Flake-gate”; the unfortunate malfunction which occurred during the opening ceremonies.

Some of the posts are goofy, others are mean spirited. There were even “reports” which claimed that the man responsible for the 2014 Winter Olympic ring failing to open at the Sochi Opening Ceremony had been found dead (and you know they can’t put anything on the internet that isn’t true).

Before we go off and laugh too hard, I would urge Houstonians to remember another notorious malfunction that took place, and ended up dominating a different sporting event. I speak of course about the infamous wardrobe malfunction that took place at Reliant Stadium during the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show. We all remember the event, but who remembers the game?

Many NFL fans and sports writers widely considered Super Bowl XXXVIII one of the better, if not the best Super Bowl. Sports Illustrated football guru and writer Peter King hailed it as the “Greatest Super Bowl of all time.” The game went back and forth in thrilling fashion and was finally decided on New England kicker Adam Vinatieri’s 41-yard field goal with four seconds left, yet it was Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake’s performance that people talked about afterwards.

So what will we remember from the 2014 Winter Olympics?  The amazing stories of accomplishments, or a technical mishap? I think I’ll remember how, once again, a world can come together with different countries and cultures, compete with great sportsmanship and respect, and remind us that it is possible, if only for a few weeks, to believe that we more alike than we are different.

Rigging the game

NFL-nfl-4311909-1280-800When you think of non-profits organizations, names like The United Way, The American Red Cross and the Susan B. Komen Foundation come to mind.  What might surprise you is that the National Football League is also classified as a non-profit and are given tax-exempt status.  How is this possible you ask?

The IRS describes 501(c) (6) tax-exempt status this way…

Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code provides for the exemption of business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, boards of trade and professional football leagues, which are not organized for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

As you can see, the law only includes “Professional Football Leagues” which leaves Major League Baseball, The National Basketball Association and others sitting on the sidelines.   So why did Washington agree to provide preferential treatment to the NFL?

It all goes back to the hey-days of the NFL/AFL Merger.  Back in 1966, then NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle was lobbying to obtain an antitrust exemption for the merger. The antitrust and tax exemptions were put into an undisputed bill and very few people noticed or complained at the time.

That was then, this is now.  The NFL is starting to face pressure about their non-profit status, and the worst part for the NFL owners?  It’s coming from a Republican Senator.  Senator Tom Coburn who represents Oklahoma thinks the government is getting a “Raw Deal” and wants that to change.

A spokesman for the NFL said the league office itself “is classified as a not-for-profit under the tax code because the league office makes no profit.” He said the teams make the profits and they are taxed.  This is true, but what he does not mention is that NFL owners don’t pay taxes on the “dues” they pay to belong to the league (an estimated $6 million dollars a year).

Their non-profit status also means they can skip out on paying other taxes because state and local governments usually exempt these organizations from state income and sales tax as well.  This was a nice little bonus when the Super Bowl was recently held in Indianapolis because hotels and restaurants did not tax National Football League employees.

And guess what?  The NFL actually loses money in a way that would make Enron proud.  The NFL paid 8 of its top executives around $53 million dollars in 2009.   It would seem the NFL goes out of its way to lose money so they can retain its non-profit status and allow the individual teams to be more profitable.

Now how much additional tax money governments are losing out on is open to debate; it may be a little, or it may be a lot.  But when Washington continues to dance on the brink of default and gentle creatures such as Big Bird could be on the chopping block; the government might want to head into the instant replay booth to see if they need to over-turn the ruling on the field and change the 501(c) (6) tax-exempt status law.

Message To Fans…The NFL Does Not Care

527357_4636488312284_520134492_nThe sports-talk airwaves are blowing up over the latest botched call by the substitute NFL officials.  For those of you who don’t follow the game, last night’s Packers/Seahawks game came down to a last second Hail-Mary pass.  The replay clearly showed the Green Bay defender intercepting the ball, but the officials ruled “Dual Possession” and awarded the Seahawks the Touchdown.

Now even the regular officials have been known to blow calls (see Ed “Guns” Hochuli”), but this latest mangled call was reminiscent of a Marx Brothers movie.  As you can imagine, the sports-talk show hosts are outraged.  They remind us in no uncertain terms that the fans are not going to accept this type of football.

The fans?  Really?  They think the NFL is that worried about the fans?

Let us visit the replay booth for a moment…

  • This is a league whose goal it was to increase player safety, yet see no problem throwing scrub officials who are in way over their heads, increasing the risk of injuries from uncalled/missed penalties like chop blocks and blows to the head.
  • This is the league that makes its fans purchase preseason game tickets at regular season prices even though most of those games are played by people you’ve never heard of before (or after).
  • This is the league that makes fans purchase PSL (Personal Seat Licenses) which require paying them for the right to purchase tickets.
  • This is the league that rewards Buffalo fans (Disclaimer:  I am a long suffering Bills fan) by taking away one home game each year and having them play in Toronto so they can make even more money.

Now sports-talk hosts are preaching to us that we should boycott the games.  Don’t watch them they tell us.  Don’t attend the game (even though you had to take a second mortgage to buy the tickets in the first place).

This issue will be resolved, not because the fans are upset,  but because Las Vegas cannot be happy.  The Packers were 3 to 3 ½ point favorites to win that game.   The final score was 14-12 which means a lot of people lost money on that final play.   If I were the NFL, I would be a lot more worried about a visit from Tommy DeVito than Jim Rome.

The China Syndrome

olympics-uniformsThe Olympics haven’t even started and already we’re being treated to trash talking and finger pointing.  This has nothing to do with the games themselves, but the fact the official U.S. Olympic teams outfits were made in China (insert gasp here).

You don’t hear a lot of agreement in Washington these days, but it appears everyone can agree outsourcing the making of the outfits to China was a bad idea.   Republican House Speaker John Boehner said that Ralph Lauren (who is the evil mastermind behind this sinister plot) should “know better”.  Senate Harry Reid from Nevada said “the uniforms should be put in a pile and burned” immediately conjuring heartwarming images of book burnings in Nazi Germany and burning Beatles records in the bible belt.

Interesting how politics can make force one to speak out of both sides one’s mouth.  Moving jobs to China is simply part of free enterprise and part of living in a global economy, but having an American company like Ralph Lauren manufacture uniforms to be worn by our Olympic athlete is simply un-American!  What’s a citizen to do?  Next thing you know, they’ll want to take away our iPhones!

Now before we go and burn Mr. Lauren in effigy (although one does wonder what he would wear to it), it’s important to remember that only 5% of clothing sold in the United States was actually made by Americans (that figure was 95% back in 1960).   Hindsight being 20/20, Ralph Lauren could have created a wonderful “Made In  America” campaign and had us all waving the flag, but than again, nobody seemed to care that the U.S. Uniforms for the 2002 Winter Olympics held in Utah were made in Canada.

Putting all that aide, I’m more irked that they will be wearing berets with strip of red, white and blue that looks more like the French flag (is that is supposed to invoke a feeling of Americana?).

And what’s up with the huge Ralph Lauren logo on the front the blazer?  Those makes soccer uniforms seem classy.  If we want to go down that road, why take a cue from NSCAR and sell multiple sponsorship logos?  Maybe we can use that money to bring down the nation debt.

Greatest Match Ever?

manchester-cityI have to admit that I have only recently started to enjoy the English Premier Soccer league (Barkley’s), but yesterday’s match was one of, if not the, best sporting event I have ever watched.

Manchester City needed to win to be crowned champions, and Queen’s Park Rangers (what a great name for a sports team) had to win to stay in the league and not be de-listed.

It started poorly for QPR giving up a weak goal, but they roared back to score twice and led 2-1 when play went into stoppage time.  Besides the goals, there was also a classic knee to the butt that drew a red card and so many corners for Manchester City, that I lost count.  After all that, the ref put 5 minutes up on the clock and Manchester City put the ball in the goal twice to win.

man-city-fansWatching the Manchester City fans faces go from joy to total despair to simply going bonkers at the end was like watching a roller coaster ride.  I can’t imagine what they went through, especially when you consider how long they have been second to their arch rivals, Manchester United (They last won in 1968).  It was also funny seeing the Man U. coach’s face when he learned that City had come back.

The game was so dramatic, the announcer screamed “They’ll make a movie of this match” when final whistle blew.  Who says soccer, errrrr football is boring?